What is PatentReview?
PatentReview is an independent professional initiative dedicated to supporting the technical and legal review of patents of public interest, while ensuring the transparent publication of documents, analyses and project developments that may lawfully be disclosed.
The project is founded on the principles of transparency, verifiable documentation and evidence-based communication.
What is the objective of the project?
The current objective of the project is to prepare, fund and publicly document revocation proceedings in Hungary concerning two related patents.
In addition, we aim to develop an accessible yet professionally rigorous knowledge base explaining the technical background of the patents under review, the relevant legal issues, the sources on which our analyses are based, and the progress of the proceedings.
Why was this initiative launched?
The patents under review first attracted our attention after it became publicly known that one of the named inventors is a public figure whose widely recognised professional background is not primarily associated with the technical field to which the patents relate.
This fact, in itself, proves nothing about either inventorship or the validity of the patents. However, from both a professional and an ethical perspective, it prompted us to undertake a more detailed examination of the publicly available documentation and the technical substance of the inventions.
During our preliminary technical and legal assessment, we identified issues which, in our view, may justify the initiation of formal patent revocation proceedings in relation to the two patents. We believe there are legitimate grounds for examining whether all statutory requirements for maintaining patent protection have been fully satisfied.
The final determination will not be made by PatentReview, but by the competent authorities responsible for the proceedings.
Is this a political initiative?
No.
PatentReview is not a political organisation, is not affiliated with any political party, and does not engage in political campaigning.
The project focuses exclusively on the technical and legal aspects of the patents under review. Our objective is not to judge individuals, but to analyse publicly available documents, technical solutions, legal arguments and supporting evidence.
The fact that a public figure may be among the inventors or proprietors of a patent can increase the level of public interest in the case. However, it does not alter the technical or legal standards by which the patent must be assessed.
Why is the project community funded?
Preparing and conducting patent revocation proceedings requires substantial technical, legal, administrative and communication resources, as well as the involvement of independent experts.
Community funding allows the project to remain independent of any single financial supporter and helps ensure that its work is not influenced by any individual commercial or political interest.
We are committed to regularly publishing updates on the use of contributions, progress towards our funding goals, and the overall progress of the project.
Why is this project important?
One of the fundamental principles of the patent system is that granted patents should be open to lawful review where appropriate.
Where well-founded technical or legal questions arise regarding the validity of a patent, their formal examination can strengthen the transparency, credibility and legal certainty of the patent system.
This is particularly important where patents have substantial economic value or have generated significant licensing or royalty income. In such cases, there is a strong public interest in ensuring that all statutory requirements for maintaining patent protection can, where appropriate, be subject to a full and formal review.
PatentReview believes that lawful review proceedings do not weaken the patent system; rather, they reinforce confidence in the validity and legitimacy of existing patent rights.
What does PatentReview claim?
PatentReview does not claim that the patents under review are invalid.
Our position is that the publicly available documents, together with our preliminary technical and legal analysis, have identified issues that may justify the initiation of formal patent revocation proceedings.
In Hungary, revocation proceedings are heard at first instance by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO). Decisions of the Office are subject to judicial review in accordance with applicable law.
PatentReview does not make administrative or judicial decisions, nor does it seek to prejudge the outcome of any proceedings.
Who is involved in the project?
The project is led by István Benedek, a computer scientist, software developer and independent technical analyst.
He is responsible for coordinating the research, conducting technical analyses, providing the project's professional leadership, and overseeing the documentation and project updates published by PatentReview.
At various stages of the project, patent attorneys, legal experts, technical specialists and other independent contributors may also be involved. The composition of the team may change as the proceedings progress and as different areas of expertise become necessary.
What principles guide the project?
PatentReview is guided by the following core principles:
evidence-based analysis;
professional independence;
transparent operation;
publicly verifiable documentation;
fact-based communication;
respect for lawful procedures;
independence from supporter influence; and
clear, accessible and professionally accurate communication.
Why should you follow the project?
PatentReview is not simply about funding a patent revocation proceeding.
Our goal is to build a public, evidence-based knowledge base that provides ongoing information about:
the progress of the project;
official documents that may lawfully be published;
technical and legal analyses;
the scientific literature and prior art on which our work is based;
significant developments in the proceedings; and
how financial contributions are being used.
The project is centred on transparency, verifiable documentation and evidence-based communication. Our aim is to enable members of the public to form their own informed opinions on the matters under review by providing access to lawfully publishable official documents, together with clear technical and legal analysis.
How is PatentReview different from other initiatives?
PatentReview is centred not on shaping public opinion, but on documentation, verifiability and professional analysis.
We are committed to continuously publishing, wherever legally possible, our analyses, supporting sources, official submissions, decisions, financial reports and project updates.
Our objective is not to persuade the public to accept a predetermined conclusion. Instead, we aim to make the relevant documents and professional arguments accessible and understandable, enabling everyone to reach their own informed conclusions based on the available evidence.
Why is PatentReview not operated by an association or foundation?
PatentReview is currently an independent professional initiative coordinated by the Project Lead.
The project's primary objective is the professional preparation, funding and transparent documentation of specific patent revocation proceedings. During this initial stage, we chose an operating model that allows the project to be launched quickly and managed efficiently.
We believe that transparency is achieved not merely through a particular legal structure, but through public accountability, the use of dedicated project funds, regular financial reporting, and clearly published operating principles.
Should the project's duration, scale or future development make it appropriate, we do not rule out establishing or involving an association, foundation or another suitable legal entity at a later stage.
How do you ensure the project's independence?
PatentReview's professional conclusions are based exclusively on the available evidence, publicly accessible documents, scientific and technical literature, technical analysis, and applicable law.
Neither the amount nor the source of financial support gives any contributor decision-making authority, editorial control or professional influence over the project.
Supporters cannot determine the project's professional conclusions, dictate which arguments should be advanced, or influence which documents are published or withheld.
How is the project documented?
We continuously publish analyses, supporting sources, official submissions, decisions and project updates whenever they may lawfully be made public.
For significant documents, we may also employ version control, cryptographic hashes, electronic signatures or seals, trusted timestamping and long-term archiving to help ensure that the origin and integrity of published materials can be independently verified in the future.
Formal legal submissions are often lengthy, technically complex and supported by extensive legal references, making them difficult for a general audience to interpret. For that reason, alongside the original documents we also publish clear, accessible and professionally accurate explanations and background analyses to help readers understand the technical and legal issues involved.
Which patents does the project support for review?
PatentReview's current objective is to support the professional preparation and funding of revocation proceedings in Hungary relating to two interconnected European patents.
Information about the patents under review, together with the publicly available documents and our related technical and legal analyses, will be published progressively on the project website.
What are patent revocation proceedings?
Patent revocation proceedings are an official legal process in which the competent authority examines whether a granted patent satisfies the statutory requirements for patentability.
Such proceedings are a normal and important part of the patent system, ensuring that granted patents can be reviewed after grant where appropriate.
Who decides whether a patent is valid?
PatentReview does not determine the validity of a patent.
In Hungary, patent revocation proceedings are heard at first instance by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO). Decisions of the Office may subsequently be reviewed by the courts in accordance with applicable law.
What does patent revocation mean?
Following revocation proceedings, the competent authority may decide to:
maintain the patent as granted;
maintain the patent in amended form with revised claims; or
revoke the patent in whole or in part.
The legal consequences of any decision are determined exclusively by the applicable legislation.
Why are you seeking revocation proceedings?
During our preliminary technical and legal analysis, we identified issues which, in our view, may justify the initiation of formal revocation proceedings in relation to the two patents.
We believe there are legitimate grounds for examining whether all statutory requirements for patentability have been fully satisfied.
The resolution of these questions, however, is solely a matter for the competent authority within the formal proceedings.
Does PatentReview claim that the patents are definitely invalid?
No.
PatentReview does not assert in advance that the patents under review are invalid.
Our position is that the publicly available documents, together with our preliminary technical and legal analysis, have identified issues that may justify an official review.
The final decision can only be made by the authority or court with the appropriate legal jurisdiction.
What evidence and arguments does the project rely on?
The project relies exclusively on publicly available sources.
Our analyses are based, among other things, on:
patent specifications;
documents generated during the patent examination process;
prior art;
scientific publications;
technical and legal literature;
independent technical analyses; and
the applicable legal framework.
Why don't you publish the complete revocation submission immediately?
To preserve the integrity and effectiveness of the proceedings, certain documents can only be published at the appropriate procedural stage.
In addition, the revocation submission is expected to be a substantial document containing extensive technical and legal references together with complex professional arguments. On its own, such a document would be difficult for most readers to understand.
For that reason, our objective is not merely to publish the submission itself, but also to explain it in a way that is both accessible and technically accurate. Throughout the project, individual arguments, supporting technical material and the cited documents will also be presented through separate analyses.
All documents and project developments that may lawfully be disclosed will be published as soon as reasonably practicable.
How long are the revocation proceedings expected to take?
The duration of patent revocation proceedings depends on many factors and cannot be predicted with certainty.
Based on our current planning, we estimate that the project will run for approximately 12 to 18 months.
What happens after the revocation request is filed?
Once the request has been submitted, the competent authority will examine whether it satisfies the applicable procedural and substantive requirements.
During the proceedings, the parties may submit observations and evidence, the authority may carry out further examination where necessary, and a formal decision will ultimately be issued.
The parties have access to the legal remedies provided under the applicable legislation.
What happens if the authority does not agree with PatentReview?
PatentReview fully respects the decisions of the competent authorities and courts.
Our objective is not to achieve a predetermined outcome, but to ensure that the technical and legal issues identified are examined through the appropriate official procedures by the authorities responsible for deciding the matter.
Why is public transparency important?
PatentReview aims to ensure that the public can follow not only the final outcome of the proceedings but also, within the limits permitted by law, the official documents, technical analyses and legal arguments published during the process.
We believe that evidence-based, document-driven public information contributes to greater transparency within the patent system and helps strengthen public confidence.
Why are the proceedings being initiated in Hungary first?
The project's current funding objective is limited to the preparation and conduct of revocation proceedings in Hungary.
Depending on the outcome of the Hungarian proceedings and the financial resources available, we will consider whether similar revocation proceedings should also be initiated in other countries where the patents remain in force.
Any such decision will be announced publicly.
What does PatentReview consider a successful outcome?
PatentReview's primary objective is not to achieve a particular procedural outcome.
We consider the project successful if the technical and legal issues identified are thoroughly examined through official proceedings and if the final decision is reached following a transparent, well-documented and professionally rigorous process.
We believe that this, in itself, contributes to strengthening both the credibility of the patent system and public confidence in its operation.
Why does the project rely on community funding?
Preparing and conducting patent revocation proceedings requires substantial technical, legal and administrative resources. PatentReview aims to fund these activities through community support in a transparent manner while preserving its professional independence.
How much funding is required?
The project has established two funding milestones.
The minimum funding goal covers the essential technical and legal work required to initiate the revocation proceedings in Hungary.
The full funding goal enables the project to be carried out in its entirety, including detailed technical research, independent expert opinions, legal opinions, comprehensive documentation and full project communications.
A detailed budget is available on the Funding page.
How was the budget prepared?
The budget has been prepared on the basis of the anticipated duration of the project, the level of expert involvement required, and current market rates for the relevant professional services.
Our objective was not to define a maximum budget, but to provide a realistic and transparent estimate of the project's expected costs.
What will the contributions be used for?
All financial contributions are used exclusively to support the implementation of the project.
This includes, in particular:
patent attorney services;
technical research and analysis;
independent technical expert services;
independent legal opinions;
official fees and administrative charges;
project management;
communications and supporter relations;
IT infrastructure and software licences;
banking and administrative costs; and
independent financial auditing.
Why aren't all individual costs published in detail?
The project publishes its funding objectives, principal expenditure categories and financial reports.
However, certain contractual arrangements, professional collaborations and commercial agreements may contain confidential information. For this reason, it is not always possible to disclose every financial detail in full.
What happens if the project receives less funding than planned?
If the project receives less than its funding target, the available resources will be allocated according to predefined professional priorities.
Priority will be given to:
official fees and mandatory administrative charges;
technical research and analysis;
essential legal opinions;
the core costs required to operate and document the project;
independent technical expert opinions;
independent financial auditing; and
patent attorney services.
The scope and timetable of the project will be adjusted to reflect the funding available.
What happens if the project receives more funding than expected?
If PatentReview receives contributions exceeding its full funding target, any surplus will be used exclusively to further the project's professional objectives.
Our first priority is to ensure the complete funding of the revocation proceedings in Hungary.
If additional funds remain available afterwards, we will consider whether the available evidence and applicable legal framework justify initiating similar revocation proceedings in other countries where the patents remain in force.
Any such decisions, together with details of how the additional funding will be used, will be announced publicly.
Who manages the contributions?
PatentReview is currently not operated by a separate legal entity.
Until such an organisation is established, all voluntary financial contributions are received and administered by the Project Lead, István Benedek, through a dedicated bank account used exclusively for the purposes of PatentReview.
Regular financial reports will be published regarding the use of project funds.
How can I monitor how contributions are used?
PatentReview regularly publishes:
progress towards the funding goals;
the total amount of contributions received;
expenditure by major budget category; and
updates on the project's professional progress.
Will there be an independent financial audit?
Yes.
The project budget includes funding for an independent financial audit to ensure that the use of contributions remains transparent and independently verifiable.
What happens to any funds remaining after the project is completed?
The current funding objective is limited to financing the planned revocation proceedings in Hungary together with the related technical, legal and administrative work.
If the project receives contributions exceeding its funding target, or if funds remain after the completion of the Hungarian proceedings, we will consider whether the available evidence and applicable legal framework support initiating revocation proceedings in other countries.
Supporters will be informed in advance of any such decision, and full details will be published on the PatentReview website.
Why isn't PatentReview operated by an association or foundation?
PatentReview is currently an independent professional initiative coordinated by the Project Lead.
Its primary purpose is the professional preparation, funding and transparent documentation of a specific patent revocation project. During this initial stage, we chose an operating model that allows the project to be launched quickly and managed efficiently.
We believe that transparency is achieved not merely through a particular legal structure, but through public accountability. Accordingly, we publish our funding objectives, budget, principal expenditure categories, project developments that may lawfully be disclosed, and regular financial reports.
Should the future development or scale of the project make it appropriate, we do not rule out establishing or involving another legal structure, such as an association or foundation.
How can I be confident that my contribution supports the project?
A voluntary financial contribution is a good-faith contribution towards the objectives of PatentReview. Individual supporters cannot, of course, trace the use of each individual payment.
We therefore undertake to publish regular updates on the project's financial progress, progress towards the funding goals, and the principal categories of expenditure.
All contributions are intended to be used in accordance with the published project objectives and the publicly available funding plan.
We are committed to transparency, public accountability and evidence-based communication.
Why aren't all financial details made public?
PatentReview is committed to achieving the highest possible level of transparency.
At the same time, we must respect the privacy rights of individuals involved in the project, comply with contractual confidentiality obligations where applicable, and observe all relevant data protection legislation.
For that reason, our financial reports present the project's finances in a transparent manner without disclosing information whose publication would violate legal requirements or contractual obligations.
How can I support the PatentReview project?
You can support the project by making a voluntary financial contribution.
At present, contributions can be made via:
bank transfer; or
the electronic payment methods available on the website.
We currently accept voluntary financial contributions in Hungarian Forint (HUF) and Euro (EUR).
How much can I contribute?
You are free to choose the amount of your contribution.
The amounts displayed on the website are simply suggested contribution levels intended to make the process more convenient.
Every contribution, regardless of its amount, helps support the project.
Why do you recommend bank transfers?
If possible, we kindly encourage you to support the project by direct bank transfer.
Card payment providers and payment intermediaries may charge transaction fees, meaning that a larger proportion of your contribution can be used directly for the project's objectives when you pay by bank transfer.
Nevertheless, every form of support is greatly appreciated.
Can I support the project anonymously?
Yes.
Several supporters have expressed a preference to contribute anonymously.
Where permitted by applicable law, PatentReview accepts anonymous voluntary financial contributions.
Will I receive confirmation of my contribution?
Yes.
If you contribute using one of the electronic payment methods available on the website, the payment provider will automatically send confirmation that the transaction has been completed successfully.
For bank transfers, we do not send a separate confirmation. If your bank confirms that the transfer has been successfully completed, you can be confident that your contribution has been received.
Can I support the project from another country?
Yes.
The project can be supported from abroad by international bank transfer (IBAN/SWIFT) or through the electronic payment methods available on the website.
Can a company or organisation support the project?
Yes.
If you wish to contribute on behalf of a company, foundation, association or other organisation, we kindly ask that you contact us before making the contribution.
Corporate and organisational support may require prior consultation or a written support agreement.
Will I receive anything in return for my contribution?
No.
A voluntary financial contribution is made solely to support the objectives of the PatentReview project and is provided without consideration.
A contribution does not confer any ownership rights, decision-making authority or editorial influence, nor does it affect the project's professional work.
Can a larger contribution influence the project's professional decisions?
No.
PatentReview's professional conclusions are based exclusively on the available evidence, technical analysis, scientific and technical literature, and applicable law.
The amount of a contribution does not, in any way, influence the project's technical, legal or professional decisions.
Can I request a refund?
A voluntary financial contribution is a non-commercial contribution made to support the objectives of the PatentReview project.
Accordingly, contributions are generally non-refundable once they have been made.
We therefore encourage you to consider your contribution carefully before making a payment. This does not affect any refund rights that may arise under applicable law.
What payment reference should I use for a bank transfer?
We recommend using the following payment reference:
"Voluntary Financial Contribution"
Can I support the project more than once?
Yes.
You are welcome to support the project at any time. Every voluntary financial contribution helps advance the project's professional objectives.
Can I contribute in instalments?
Yes.
There is no minimum or maximum contribution amount, and there is no limit on the number of contributions you may make.
How can I be confident that my contribution supports the project?
A voluntary financial contribution is a good-faith contribution towards the objectives of PatentReview. Individual supporters cannot, of course, trace the use of each individual payment.
We therefore undertake to publish regular updates on the project's financial progress, progress towards the funding goals, and the principal categories of expenditure.
All contributions are intended to be used in accordance with the published project objectives and the publicly available funding plan.
We are committed to transparency, public accountability and evidence-based communication.
Why do you ask companies and organisations to contact you before making a contribution?
Corporate and organisational contributions may require additional consultation, accounting arrangements or a written support agreement.
This helps ensure that each contribution is handled lawfully, transparently and under terms that are clear to both parties.
Do you accept every contribution?
No.
We reserve the right to decline contributions that would be unlawful, clearly abusive, or likely to compromise the independence or integrity of the project.
Our objective is to ensure that PatentReview remains professionally independent and credible under all circumstances.
Why is transparency so important to PatentReview?
Transparency and accountability are among PatentReview's core principles.
Our aim is to publish, as comprehensively as possible, information about the project's progress, the achievement of its funding goals, documents that may lawfully be disclosed, and the technical and legal analyses supporting our work.
What documents will you publish?
Subject to applicable legal requirements, we intend to publish, among other things:
technical analyses;
legal analyses;
cited scientific and technical literature;
project progress reports;
official decisions;
submissions that may lawfully be made public;
project updates; and
financial reports.
Why aren't all documents made public?
The project must comply with applicable law and respect the procedural rules governing official proceedings.
Some documents, or parts of them, may only be published at a particular stage of the proceedings, while others may contain information that cannot legally or contractually be disclosed.
How do you ensure that published documents cannot later be altered?
For significant documents, we may use electronic signatures or electronic seals, trusted timestamps, and cryptographic hash values.
We also intend to maintain version control and regular archives so that the origin and integrity of published materials can be independently verified at a later date.
How often is the website updated?
The PatentReview website is updated on an ongoing basis.
Whenever new information, documents or significant project developments become available, we aim to publish them as promptly as reasonably practicable.
Will you publish the full revocation submission?
Where permitted by the procedural stage and applicable law, yes.
However, the submission is expected to be a lengthy document containing complex technical and legal arguments that may be difficult for most readers to interpret on its own.
For that reason, we will also publish accessible explanations and detailed background analyses alongside the submission.
Will you publish the decisions of the authorities?
Yes.
We intend to publish any administrative or judicial decisions that may lawfully be disclosed, together with our professional commentary and analysis.
What happens if PatentReview gets something wrong?
PatentReview is committed to evidence-based professional analysis.
If any of our published statements are subsequently shown to require correction or clarification, we will acknowledge this publicly and make the necessary amendments.
Who oversees the project?
The project is based on publicly available documentation.
Our published analyses, supporting documents, financial reports and project updates are available for anyone to examine and evaluate.
In addition, the project budget includes provision for an independent financial audit.
How do you safeguard your professional independence?
PatentReview's professional conclusions are based solely on the available evidence, technical analysis, scientific and technical literature, and the applicable legal framework.
Neither supporters nor external partners may influence the project's technical or legal conclusions.
Will you publish the project budget?
Yes.
We regularly publish our funding goals, the principal expenditure categories and updates on the project's financial progress.
At the same time, personal data and confidential contractual or commercial information are handled in accordance with applicable law.
How do you document the project's progress?
We publish regular project updates covering the major stages of the project.
These include, among other things:
completed technical analyses;
progress in the legal preparation;
submitted applications and requests;
significant milestones in the official proceedings; and
progress towards the project's funding goals.
Why don't you publish the names of every expert involved?
In some cases, disclosing the identity of individual contributors could unnecessarily affect their professional work or personal security, or they may simply prefer not to have their identities made public.
PatentReview respects the privacy rights of everyone involved while seeking to ensure that the quality and credibility of the project's work can be assessed on the basis of the published evidence and documentation alone.
What guarantees do you provide regarding the project's credibility?
The credibility of PatentReview is founded not on promises, but on publicly verifiable documents, evidence-based professional analysis, regular financial reporting and transparent operation.
We believe it is not enough simply to present conclusions. Members of the public should also be able to examine the underlying documents and evidence for themselves, enabling everyone to form their own informed opinion.
Why was the PatentReview website created?
The PatentReview website serves as the project's official communication platform.
It is where we publish documents that may lawfully be disclosed, technical and legal analyses, project updates, and information relating to the project's funding.
Why do you communicate publicly about an ongoing case?
We believe that matters of significant public interest should be accompanied by factual, evidence-based and document-driven communication.
At all times, however, we respect the applicable legal framework and the procedural rules governing the official proceedings.
Is PatentReview trying to influence public opinion?
No.
The project's objective is not to persuade the public, but to inform it.
Our aim is to enable people to form their own views based on lawfully published documents, technical analyses and legal arguments.
How do you ensure objective communication?
PatentReview's communications are based exclusively on verifiable documents, publicly available sources and professional analysis.
We seek to clearly distinguish between:
established facts;
the contents of publicly available documents;
the project's professional analysis and conclusions; and
matters that can only be decided by the competent authority or the courts.
Who speaks on behalf of the project?
The project's official communications are coordinated primarily by the Project Lead.
Where appropriate, external experts or the project's legal representatives may also comment on matters within their areas of expertise.
Do you give interviews to the media?
Yes.
PatentReview welcomes enquiries from journalists where they are intended to support balanced, factual and professional reporting.
How do you deal with inaccurate media coverage?
If factually inaccurate or misleading information about the project is published, we will seek to correct it in a professional and constructive manner, supported by documentary evidence wherever appropriate.
Our primary objective is not to engage in public disputes, but to ensure accurate information is available.
Will you publish criticism of the project?
Yes.
We regard professional criticism as a natural part of scientific and legal discourse.
Where criticism raises substantive professional arguments, we intend to respond publicly and with appropriate supporting evidence.
How do you distinguish facts from opinions?
PatentReview seeks to make a clear distinction in every publication between:
facts derived from official documents;
the cited scientific and technical literature;
the project's technical and legal analyses; and
the professional conclusions drawn from those materials.
Why don't you comment on every public statement?
Our communications are not driven by the daily news cycle.
We comment only on matters that are directly relevant to the project's professional objectives or to the official proceedings.
What communication principles do you follow?
Our communications are guided by the following principles:
objectivity;
accuracy;
evidence-based reasoning;
professional integrity;
transparency;
respect for privacy and personal rights; and
respect for ongoing legal and administrative proceedings.
Why don't you take a stronger position on certain issues?
PatentReview does not seek to prejudge the outcome of official proceedings.
Our objective is not to pronounce judgments, but to explain the technical and legal issues that have arisen and the evidence on which they are based.
The final decision always rests with the competent authority or the courts.
Can I contact the project? Where should media enquiries be sent?
Yes.
Members of the media are welcome to send enquiries to press@patentreview.eu. We aim to respond to all enquiries as promptly as reasonably possible.
May I use material published on the website?
Content published on the PatentReview website may be protected by copyright.
Lawful quotation is, of course, permitted in accordance with applicable copyright law, provided that the source is properly acknowledged and the original meaning of the material is preserved.
If you wish to reproduce or republish substantial portions of our content, we kindly ask that you contact us in advance.
How do you ensure that published information remains verifiable over time?
For important documents, PatentReview seeks to use electronic signatures or electronic seals, trusted timestamps, version control and long-term archiving.
Our objective is to ensure that it remains possible to verify precisely when each document was published and that its content has not subsequently been altered.
How can I contact the PatentReview project?
You can contact us using the contact form on our website or through the email addresses provided on the Contact page.
We aim to respond to all enquiries as promptly as reasonably possible.
What types of enquiries do you welcome?
We are pleased to receive, among other things:
professional comments and feedback;
technical or legal questions;
recommendations for relevant scientific publications;
information relating to prior art;
proposals for collaboration;
media enquiries; and
enquiries regarding corporate or organisational partnerships.
Are you open to professional collaboration?
Yes.
We welcome collaborations that may strengthen the technical or legal foundations of the project.
This may include, for example:
technical experts;
researchers;
university academics;
patent attorneys;
lawyers; and
information technology and cybersecurity specialists.
How can I share technical material or prior art documents?
If you have a scientific publication, patent document or other technical information that may be relevant to the project, please contact us at experts@patentreview.eu.
All submitted material will be reviewed from a professional and technical perspective.
Can I volunteer?
Yes.
If you would like to support the project through your professional expertise or organisational skills, we invite you to send us a brief description of your experience and explain how you believe you could contribute to the project's objectives.
How can I contact the Project Lead?
Messages submitted through the contact form or our general contact email address are also received by the Project Lead.
Where appropriate, we can also arrange direct communication.
Where should media enquiries be sent?
Journalists and media representatives are welcome to send enquiries to press@patentreview.eu.
We aim to respond to all media enquiries as promptly as reasonably possible.
How can a company or organisation get in touch?
If you are contacting the project on behalf of a company, association, foundation, research institution or another organisation, please email us at partners@patentreview.eu.
The details of corporate and organisational collaborations are discussed individually.
Is professional consultation available?
Yes.
If you wish to discuss a technical or legal issue relevant to the project, please contact us in advance.
The format and timing of any consultation will be arranged on a case-by-case basis.
Can I request a meeting?
Yes.
Where appropriate, we are happy to arrange either an in-person or an online meeting. The details will be agreed in advance.
Do you organise public events?
Yes.
Our plans include professional presentations, community meetings and public information events.
Details of upcoming events will be published on our website and through our official communication channels.
How do you handle information submitted to the project?
All enquiries and submitted information are treated confidentially and used only where they are consistent with the objectives of the project.
Personal data is processed in accordance with applicable data protection legislation and our published Privacy Policy.
Will I receive feedback on material I submit?
Where possible, we endeavour to respond to all substantive professional submissions.
However, due to the volume of material we may receive, we cannot guarantee that every submission will receive a detailed technical assessment or an individual response.
How can I support the project apart from making a financial contribution?
You can make a valuable contribution by:
sharing relevant scientific literature or prior art;
participating in professional collaboration;
helping to increase awareness of the project;
introducing media contacts;
supporting the organisation of events; or
volunteering your professional expertise or organisational assistance.
We welcome all such offers of support, provided they are consistent with the objectives and principles of PatentReview.
What is the purpose of the Technical and Legal Knowledge Base?
The purpose of the Knowledge Base is to present the technical background of the patents under review, the associated legal issues, and the supporting scientific literature in a way that is both accessible and professionally rigorous.
Our goal is not only to present our conclusions, but also to explain the technical and legal reasoning that leads to them.
Who is the Knowledge Base intended for?
The Knowledge Base is designed for a broad audience.
We aim to make it valuable for:
mathematicians;
computer scientists;
engineers;
researchers;
patent attorneys;
lawyers;
university students;
journalists; and
anyone with an interest in the subject.
What topics does the Knowledge Base cover?
Topics include, among others:
biometric authentication;
digital signatures;
authentication systems;
cryptography;
information security;
patent law;
European and Hungarian patent procedures;
prior art;
scientific publications;
technical analyses; and
legal analyses.
Does the Knowledge Base focus only on the patents under review?
No.
Although the project currently centres on two specific patents, the purpose of the Knowledge Base is much broader.
By explaining the relevant technical disciplines, scientific developments and legal framework, we also hope to promote a better understanding of the patent system as a whole.
What sources are your analyses based on?
Our analyses rely exclusively on verifiable sources.
These include, among others:
patent documents;
scientific publications;
technical standards;
textbooks and reference works;
official administrative documents;
court decisions; and
other publicly available professional sources.
How are the technical analyses prepared?
Our technical analyses objectively examine the technical solutions described in the patent specifications using a document-based methodology.
We seek to ensure that every significant technical statement is supported by appropriate scientific or technical evidence.
How are the legal analyses prepared?
Our legal analyses are based on applicable legislation, relevant case law and publicly available patent documentation.
They represent the professional opinion of PatentReview and do not constitute legal advice.
What is the difference between PatentReview's analyses and an official decision?
PatentReview provides technical and legal analyses.
Only the competent authority or the courts have the legal authority to determine whether a patent is valid or invalid.
How do you distinguish facts from professional conclusions?
In every analysis we seek to make a clear distinction between:
publicly available facts;
the referenced documents;
the technical analyses;
the legal assessments; and
the conclusions drawn from them.
Will you publish the supporting literature?
Yes.
Wherever reasonably possible, we support significant statements with references so that readers can independently verify the sources on which our analyses are based.
Can I report a technical or factual error?
Absolutely.
If you identify an inaccuracy, error or omission in any of our analyses, we welcome your professional feedback.
Substantive comments will be carefully reviewed, and where appropriate, the relevant content will be corrected or clarified publicly.
How do you ensure the credibility of your analyses?
PatentReview does not seek to justify a predetermined conclusion.
Our analyses are based on the available evidence, publicly accessible documents, scientific literature and the applicable legal framework.
If new evidence or a well-founded professional counterargument emerges, we will take it into account in our analyses.
Why do you explain technical issues in an accessible way?
The revocation proceedings are expected to involve extensive and highly technical documentation, together with complex legal arguments.
Our objective is not merely to publish these materials, but also to explain them in a way that is understandable to readers without a technical background while maintaining professional accuracy.
Will the Knowledge Base continue to grow?
Yes.
The Knowledge Base will be expanded continuously with new technical analyses, legal background materials, scientific references and documents that become publicly available during the official proceedings.
May I use material from the Knowledge Base?
Lawful quotation is, of course, permitted in accordance with applicable copyright law.
When quoting our material, we kindly ask that you acknowledge the source and preserve the original meaning of the content.
If you wish to reproduce or republish substantial portions of our material, please contact us beforehand.